![]() The partially enclosed build plate and mostly concealed filament rack contribute to the Artemis’ appearance. Especially in comparison to budget 3D printers that are in that $200-400 range and usually require assembly. ![]() The Artemis is certainly one of the nicest looking 3D printers out there. ![]() On-screen prompts guide you through the leveling process and make it super easy-I nailed it on my first try. So much so that I releveled and recalibrated it two more times. Out of those two steps, which would you assume is the more difficult task? I was very surprised by how easy it was to level the bed of the printer. The last few steps in the user guide before moving on to downloading the software include loading filament into the printer and leveling the build plate. Cutting some of those zip ties was stressful enough as they were around belts or other things I didn’t want to cut. I really would’ve appreciated some more clear direction on this in the user manual. What’s worse, is that there are a few more really tiny zip ties around cables on the extruder head, and I wasn’t sure if I was supposed to remove those. Most of these are easy to find or clearly labeled, but there were a couple I almost missed. Thanks.TP.Once you’ve unpacked all of your components, there are several zip ties on the inside of the Artemis that you’ll have to cut out. If not I need to find someone else with the appropriate expertise that can. Arthur Wolf over at Smoothieware offered his assistance so hopefully we can work that out soon. I have what I need to build, but I want to find someone to work with me to put the polar coordinate firmware package together before I do. I'm still debating on the best way to mechanically connect the 3 riser carriages to the motor(s). I plan to use one or more Nema 23s for the Z axis wired parallel to external stepper controller(s). The 600mm diameter heat bed will bolt to the top of that. The Z axis will consist of a 2020 extrusion hexagon platform attached to the three 6020 risers. Distance, angle, and speed are the XY positioning variables. Both X and Y axis are rotational, and driven by opposing Nema 17s using 6mm interlocking belts for the X, and 9mm interlocking belts for the Y. That assembly will be CNC machined and put together as a self-contained unit that bolts to the top hexagon horizontals. I'm departing from a conventional delta on this design, and replacing the effector and arms with the polar XY rotational assembly. All that remains as I originally planned for delta printer hardware I bought for that design. I plan to use 6mm clear Lexan for the full height door, framed with 4020 V-Slot extrusions. I'm using powder coated MDF between all the risers for the infill panels and to make the structure rigid. The six 60° outside corners are 2020 extrusions I bought from Musimi. The frame uses OpenBuilds V-Slot vertical 6020 X 1500mm extrusions much as you've shown, with hexagon rather than triangle 6020 V-Slot horizontals at the top and bottom. I'm using a delta chassis but not the arms and effector. We are the same age so I know the feeling. Thanks for your feedback.any suggestions or critique is appreciated. Any thoughts on that? Any other issues come to mind? The mechanical design allows end to end movement of the print head through the 0,0 center coordinate, but I'm thinking some fixed distance past center is really all that is needed to give full print coverage across the bed. Is anyone familiar with a software package that exists to manage these movements that can be configured for Smoothieware? I have the Smoothieboard hardware already so I'd like to stick with that. My question to the group stems from my lack of knowledge on polar coordinate plotting and integration of that into the conventional 3D print process chain. Since this will be an enclosed chamber printer, I'm leaning toward moving the bed and keeping the XY stationary so drive motors and components are fixed outside the heat chamber. Either case the bed doesn't rotate, the XY rotates per the drawing. I have the option of moving the bed on the Z axis, or leaving it fixed as per a conventional delta, and letting the XY mechanism travel along the Z legs. I have designed a printer that uses a combo polar/linear XY mechanism and a conventional Z axis all on a Delta chassis design.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |